Wednesday, February 11, 2015

153 (2014-2015): Review of A MONTH IN THE COUNTRY (February 10, 2015)

"More Like a Month in the Theatre"




It looks like Chekhov, it sounds like Chekhov, it feels like Chekhov . . . Guess what? It’s Turgenev! Ivan Turgenev’s (1818-1893) A MONTH IN THE COUNTRY, now playing at the Classic Stage Company, was written between 1848 and 1850, published in 1855, premiered in 1872, and had its first major success in 1879. It was written nearly half a century before Anton Chekhov created Russia’s greatest dramatic masterpieces. In 1909 it was revived by the Moscow Art Theatre, with Konstantin Stanislavsky playing Rakitin in a production that established it in the modern repertory.
Taylor Schilling, Peter Dinklage. Photo: Joan Marcus.
As in Chekhov the play takes place on a country estate; its unhappy major characters suffer from unrequited love; a languid despair lingers in the air, mingled with world-weary humor; there’s a doctor hanging around; asides are common (although here spoken directly to the audience, which Chekhov avoided); and money plays a significant role in at least one romantic relationship. (Unlike the fate of the title characters in THE THREE SISTERS, by the end of A MONTH IN THE COUNTRY everybody seems to be leaving for Moscow.) It may not quite achieve the depth and texture of the master, but, even as Chekhov-lite, the play is both dramatically strong and psychologically truthful enough to have been able to receive numerous international productions over the years. Its first New York production arrived in a 1930 Theatre Guild version, with Alla Nazimova as Natalya.
Taylor Schilling, Peter Dinklage. Photo: Joan Marcus.
As translated by John Christopher Jones, the CSC revival, thankfully trimmed to a two-hour playing time from a more usual three, has the tone of a light comedy of manners and romance. The language, using words like “terrific,” “weird,” and “lousy,” is much more American in flavor than, say, the British-inflected versions of Constance Garnett and Emlyn Williams (the only two—of many—to which I had immediate access). One never senses, though, that Turgenev’s language is considered by some critics to be more beautiful than that of any of his countrymen. The production, directed by Erica Schmidt, languishes in the kind of stagnant atmosphere often found in misconceived Chekhov revivals. This isn’t to deny the laughter that greets the play’s more amusing lines; it’s just that, apart from moments scattered too far from one another, there’s a heaviness about the goings on that often sucks the spirit out of them.
Taylor Schilling, Mike Faist. Photo: Joan Marcus.
Natalya Petronova (Taylor Schilling) is the bored, moody, and beautiful 29-year-old wife of rich landowner Arkady (Anthony Edwards), 36. Her closest friend is Rakitin (Peter Dinklage), 30, a guest at Arkady and Natalya’s country estate, deeply in love with Natalya. She teases him along with her affections without ever committing to him. (The relationship is based on that of Turgenev and the married Pauline Viardot, a famous opera singer to whom he was slavishly devoted for many years.) Natalya’s true affections lie with Aleksey Belyaev (Mike Faist), the handsome, charming 21-year-old tutor to her 10-year-old son, Kolya (Ian Etheridge), to whom Natalya’s 17-year-old ward, Vera (Megan West), is also strongly attracted. Aleksey may seem perfectly suited to Vera, but he secretly longs for Natalya although unable, because of the circumstances, to express these feelings. (Ms. Schmidt, however, inadvisedly chooses to insert a moment showing Aleksey and Natalya rushing by, partly clothed, as if in the throes of a sexual encounter.)
Mike Faist, Megan West. Photo: Joan Marcus.
The family doctor, Shpigelsky (Thomas Jay Ryan), proposes to Vera that she marry his friend, the unattractive, foolish, middle-aged, but wealthy landowner Bolshintsov (Peter Appel), a proposal that, only after circumstances between Natalya and Aleksey sufficiently depress her, she ultimately accepts. (Natalya is complicit in subverting Vera’s potential rivalry.) The complex web of desires and rejections, and the suspicions of Natalya’s husband, force Aleksey and Rakitin to depart for Moscow, leaving behind the saddened Natalya. Meanwhile, Shpigelsky has convinced Lizavetta (Annabella Sciorra), a companion to Arkady’s mother, Anna (Elizabeth Franz), to marry him. In one of the funniest scenes, he rattles off his defects to her. Ms. Schmidt’s staging also suggests in mimic action—as they shift furniture during the scene breaks—the blossoming love of two servants, Matvei (James Joseph O’Neil) and Katya (Elizabeth Ramos).
Taylor Schilling. Photo: Joan Marcus.
For all its preoccupation with external romantic complications, Turgenev’s play is mainly concerned with the internal lives of its characters, and requires exceptional acting to bring them to life. Although larded with name actors from popular TV series, films, and Broadway, the company offers nothing exceptional in their performances. Ms. Schilling and Mr. Dinklage in the leading roles are certainly competent (Mr. Dinklage—who’s married to the director—has the best male voice in the production) and each has their moments, but their work, like that of their co-actors, is not particularly memorable, nor penetrating. Mr. Faist as Aleksey is attractive enough, but he’s decidedly bland and charmless, forcing us to wonder why he’s supposedly such magnetic chick bait. Ms. West’s Vera makes a believable teenager; still, like her more experienced senior partners, she can do little to inject much interest in the proceedings.

Mark Wendland’s odd unit set, beautifully lit by Jeff Croiter, is neither indoors nor out, maintaining—for interiors and exteriors—with only a change of furniture or rugs, the same low wooden wall surrounding the three-quarters round space, with a background of birch trees on the rear wall. It’s in the vein of various skeletal Chekhov revivals, like Andrei Serban’s THE CHERRY ORCHARD at Lincoln Center in 1977, an approach that can be effective; however, the transparent/translucent canopy, with two large windows in it, hung over the set like a rectangular lampshade, is an unnecessary distraction. Tom Broecker’s period costumes are pretty, yet some of the hairstyles, like Ms. Schilling’s, are over 160 years out of date. 

Turgenev’s play should pass like two pleasant hours in the country, not a month in the theatre.  

Classic Stage Company (CSC)
136 E. 13th Street, NYC
Through February 28th